What it takes to put an AI agent into production
An agent that works in a demo is a long way from one you can trust with real customers and real systems. Here is what closes the gap.
Service 05
We build AI features and automation that connect to your data and tools: assistants that answer from your own documents, agents that complete multi-step tasks, and pipelines that turn unstructured input into structured records. Every system is designed to be measured, monitored and kept under human control.

Staff spend hours reading, extracting and re-keying information from emails, PDFs, forms or contracts into other systems.
Answers exist somewhere in policies, wikis, tickets or past projects, but finding them takes too long and depends on asking the right person.
An AI demo impressed people, but it is unreliable, expensive to run or impossible to evaluate, and nobody is confident putting it in front of customers.
Customers expect smarter search, summaries or assistance inside your software, and you need it built responsibly and cost-effectively.
Retrieval-augmented assistants that answer from your documents and systems, with sources cited so answers can be checked.
Agents that carry out multi-step tasks across your tools, with clear permissions, approval steps and logs of every action taken.
Extraction and classification of emails, invoices, forms and contracts into structured data, with confidence checks and human review where needed.
Search, summarisation, drafting and classification built into your existing application and user experience.
Test sets, quality scoring, cost tracking and alerting so you know how the system performs and when it changes.
We start by picking a narrow, valuable task and defining what good looks like before building anything. That means collecting real examples, agreeing how outputs will be judged and deciding where a person must stay in the loop. A system that reliably handles one well-defined job is worth far more than a general assistant that is right most of the time.
Models are one component among many. Most of the engineering sits around them: retrieving the right context, often from PostgreSQL with pgvector; validating structured outputs; handling failures and retries; restricting what an agent is allowed to do; and logging every step so behaviour can be audited. We work with models from Anthropic and OpenAI and design so you can switch providers as prices and capabilities change.
Evaluation is continuous, not a one-off. We build test suites from real cases, run them whenever prompts or models change, and track cost and latency alongside quality. Data handling is agreed up front, including what is sent to which provider and how long it is kept, so the system fits your privacy and compliance obligations. The code, prompts and evaluation data are yours.
You cannot eliminate errors entirely, so the design has to account for them. We ground answers in your own data with cited sources, constrain outputs to structured formats that can be validated, and route low-confidence cases to a person. Ongoing evaluation against real examples shows how often mistakes happen and whether changes improve things.
We agree data handling before building: which data is sent to a model, which provider processes it, under what terms, and how long anything is retained. Business API terms from the major providers generally exclude your data from training, and sensitive fields can be removed or masked before they leave your systems.
Build cost depends on the number of systems involved, data quality, and how much evaluation and human review the use case needs. Running cost depends on volume and the models used; we measure it from the start and optimise by choosing the smallest model that meets the quality bar and caching where possible.
It depends on the task, cost, latency and data requirements, and the best choice changes over time. We test candidate models against your own examples and build with an abstraction layer, so switching later is a configuration change rather than a rewrite.
Yes, with sensible limits. Agents get the minimum permissions needed, sensitive actions require human approval, and every step is logged. We start with read-only or draft-only behaviour and widen autonomy only once performance has been proven on real work.
An agent that works in a demo is a long way from one you can trust with real customers and real systems. Here is what closes the gap.
Vague briefs produce quotes that cannot be compared. A few days of structured thinking before you contact suppliers will save weeks of confusion later.
Tell us what you are trying to achieve. The first conversation is about understanding the problem — not selling you a solution.